Blog

  • Why We Romanticize the Past

    Why We Romanticize the Past

    Every generation believes there was a better time. Some imagine the elegance of the Victorian era. Others long for the music of the 1960s, the fashion of the 1980s, or the simplicity of childhood. The details change, but the pattern remains remarkably consistent.

    We look backward and see beauty where previous generations often saw difficulty, uncertainty, and conflict. This contradiction reveals something important. The past itself is not what attracts us. Our idea of the past does.

    Memory is not an archive that stores reality exactly as it happened. It is a creative process that selects, edits, and rearranges experience. Certain details fade. Others become more vivid. Pain loses its sharpness while moments of beauty remain surprisingly durable.

    As a result, history often appears softer and more coherent from a distance than it did when people were actually living through it. This tendency extends beyond personal memory. Entire cultures construct idealized visions of earlier eras, transforming history into a source of comfort, identity, and meaning. The Gothic tradition understood this impulse particularly well.

    Long before psychologists began studying nostalgia, Gothic writers were exploring why people become fascinated with lost worlds, ruined civilizations, ancient traditions, and vanished ways of life. Their stories suggested that romanticizing the past is not simply an act of remembrance. It is a response to the uncertainties of the present.


    Why We Romanticize the Past
    Why We Romanticize the Past

    Memory Is Not History

    One reason people romanticize the past is that memory rarely preserves events objectively.

    Psychologists have long observed that recollection is selective. Human beings do not remember every detail with equal clarity. Experiences are constantly reinterpreted through emotion, personal growth, and changing circumstances.

    This process often softens negative experiences over time.

    The frustrations of everyday life gradually lose their intensity, while meaningful moments remain emotionally vivid. Looking backward, people frequently remember the atmosphere of an era more strongly than its difficulties.

    This tendency helps explain why nostalgia can feel so persuasive.

    The past appears simpler because memory removes much of the confusion that originally accompanied it. Problems that once seemed overwhelming become manageable in retrospect. Uncertainty transforms into narrative.

    The result is not necessarily false.

    It is incomplete.

    Romanticized history emerges when memory preserves emotional truth while gradually discarding complexity.


    The Psychology of Nostalgia

    Modern psychology increasingly views nostalgia as more than sentimental longing.

    Research suggests that nostalgic reflection can strengthen feelings of continuity, belonging, and personal identity. During periods of uncertainty, people often revisit memories that provide emotional stability.

    Cultural theorist Svetlana Boym offered an especially useful distinction.

    In The Future of Nostalgia, she separated nostalgia into two forms. Restorative nostalgia attempts to rebuild an imagined past. Reflective nostalgia recognizes the distance between past and present while still finding meaning in remembrance.

    The difference matters.

    One approach seeks to recover a lost world. The other accepts that the world is gone and explores why its memory remains powerful.

    Much of Gothic culture belongs to the second category.

    Ruins, abandoned castles, faded photographs, and forgotten traditions are rarely presented as realities that can be restored. Their power comes from absence. They remind us that time changes everything while simultaneously preserving traces of what once existed.

    Nostalgia therefore becomes more than a longing for the past.

    It becomes a way of understanding the present.


    When the Present Feels Uncertain

    Periods of rapid change often produce waves of nostalgia.

    This pattern appears repeatedly throughout history. Industrialization inspired renewed interest in medieval culture. The digital age generated fascination with analog technologies. Social upheaval frequently increases public interest in traditions, heritage, and historical identity.

    The reason is not difficult to understand.

    When the future feels unpredictable, the past appears stable. Historical periods acquire symbolic qualities that help people make sense of contemporary anxieties. The reality of those eras becomes less important than what they represent.

    Victorian England, for example, is often remembered through images of elegance, craftsmanship, and ritual. The hardships of the period remain historically significant, yet they rarely dominate nostalgic imagination.

    Memory gravitates toward symbols.

    Nostalgia transforms those symbols into emotional anchors.

    The Gothic imagination recognized this tendency long before modern psychology gave it a name.

    Its fascination with ruins, ancestral histories, and lost worlds reflects a deeper understanding that the past often becomes most attractive when the present feels uncertain.


    The Gothic Revival and the Invention of Modern Nostalgia

    Although people have always looked backward with longing, the modern habit of romanticizing the past took shape during the Gothic Revival.

    Beginning in the eighteenth century and expanding throughout the nineteenth, the movement transformed medieval history into a source of fascination. Castles, cathedrals, ruins, legends, and chivalric traditions suddenly returned to cultural prominence. Writers, architects, and artists turned toward earlier centuries not because they wished to reproduce them exactly, but because those eras seemed to offer something missing from the present.

    The timing was significant.

    Europe was experiencing profound change. Scientific progress, industrialization, urban growth, and new political ideas were reshaping everyday life. Traditional social structures appeared increasingly unstable. In this environment, the medieval past acquired a powerful symbolic value.

    It represented continuity.

    It represented permanence.

    Most importantly, it represented an imagined alternative to modern uncertainty.

    The Gothic Revival therefore did more than revive historical styles. It helped establish a cultural habit that remains familiar today: using the past as a mirror through which contemporary anxieties can be explored.


    Horace Walpole and the Dream of a Lost World

    Few figures illustrate this process more clearly than Horace Walpole.

    In 1764, Walpole published The Castle of Otranto, a novel widely regarded as the first Gothic work. The story combined medieval settings, supernatural events, ancestral secrets, and ancient prophecies. Readers encountered a world that felt distant from contemporary life yet emotionally compelling.

    The novel’s importance extends beyond literary history.

    Walpole understood that the past possessed imaginative power precisely because it was no longer accessible. Medieval society could be transformed into a stage upon which fears, desires, and fantasies could unfold.

    His fascination extended beyond fiction.

    Walpole famously rebuilt his home, Strawberry Hill, in a Gothic style inspired by medieval architecture. The project was not an attempt to recreate historical reality with scholarly precision. Instead, it created an idealized vision of the past designed to evoke emotion and atmosphere.

    This distinction remains important.

    Nostalgia rarely seeks historical accuracy. It seeks emotional resonance.

    Walpole helped demonstrate how the past could be transformed into an imaginative landscape shaped as much by desire as by history.


    Why Ruins Became Beautiful

    One of the most revealing symbols of Gothic nostalgia is the ruin.

    From abandoned monasteries to crumbling castles, ruins became recurring subjects in literature, painting, and architecture. Their appeal may seem strange at first. After all, a ruin represents decay, loss, and the passage of time.

    Yet those very qualities made ruins attractive.

    Unlike functioning buildings, ruins invite imagination. Missing walls, broken towers, and empty halls encourage viewers to think about what once existed. The structure becomes a dialogue between presence and absence.

    Artists such as Caspar David Friedrich understood this instinctively.

    Paintings like The Abbey in the Oakwood present ruined architecture not as historical evidence but as emotional landscapes. The viewer encounters traces of a vanished world and instinctively begins imagining the lives, beliefs, and stories connected to it.

    This process reveals an essential feature of nostalgia.

    People are often attracted not to complete histories but to fragments. Gaps encourage imagination. Absence invites interpretation.

    The ruin becomes beautiful because it allows the mind to participate in rebuilding what has been lost.


    Ivanhoe and the Romantic Middle Ages

    If Walpole helped invent Gothic nostalgia, Sir Walter Scott helped popularize it.

    Published in 1819, Ivanhoe presented medieval England as a world of knights, tournaments, honor, and adventure. The novel achieved enormous success and shaped public perceptions of the Middle Ages for generations.

    Modern historians would point out that Scott’s version of medieval life was highly selective.

    That selectivity was precisely the point.

    The novel transformed history into a cultural myth capable of expressing values that nineteenth-century readers felt were disappearing. Chivalry became a symbol of integrity. Castles became symbols of continuity. Medieval society became a stage upon which modern concerns could be projected.

    This mechanism remains recognizable today.

    Every generation constructs its own imagined golden age. Sometimes the chosen era is Victorian. Sometimes it is the 1950s, the 1980s, or even the early years of the internet. The historical period matters less than the psychological function it serves.

    The past becomes attractive when it appears to contain qualities that feel absent from the present.

    The Gothic Revival transformed that impulse into an enduring cultural tradition.


    Gothic Nostalgia in the Digital Age

    The impulse that fueled the Gothic Revival did not disappear with the nineteenth century.

    It simply found new forms.

    Contemporary Gothic culture frequently draws upon earlier aesthetics, technologies, and artistic traditions. Darkwave musicians incorporate sounds associated with post-punk and early Gothic rock. Steampunk artists reimagine Victorian technology through a lens of fantasy and alternative history. Gothic fashion continues to revisit mourning attire, antique jewelry, lace veils, and silhouettes inspired by earlier centuries.

    These movements are not attempts to recreate the past exactly as it existed.

    Instead, they transform historical fragments into something emotionally meaningful for the present. A Victorian pocket watch, a cathedral silhouette, or an antique photograph acquires symbolic value because it evokes continuity with worlds that have largely disappeared.

    The same pattern appears throughout digital culture.

    Online communities celebrate vintage photography, abandoned architecture, analog media, and historical aesthetics with remarkable enthusiasm. Social media platforms allow people to curate idealized visions of earlier eras, much as Gothic Revival artists once transformed medieval history into an imaginative landscape.

    The technology is new.

    The psychological impulse remains familiar.

    People continue searching the past for symbols that provide meaning, beauty, and continuity within a rapidly changing world.


    Why Every Generation Invents a Golden Age

    One of nostalgia’s most fascinating characteristics is its adaptability.

    Every generation tends to identify a different period as uniquely desirable. The era chosen often reflects present concerns more than historical reality.

    For some, the Victorian period represents craftsmanship, elegance, and ritual. Others idealize the 1950s, the cultural revolutions of the 1960s, or the popular culture of the 1980s and 1990s. Younger generations increasingly express nostalgia for periods they never personally experienced.

    This phenomenon reveals something important.

    Nostalgia is rarely about returning to a specific historical moment. It is about constructing a narrative that helps make sense of contemporary life.

    The chosen era functions as a symbol. Certain qualities become amplified while others recede into the background. Complexity gives way to coherence. Contradictions become easier to ignore.

    The process resembles storytelling.

    Like novelists shaping a narrative, people select details that support a meaningful emotional interpretation of the past. Historical accuracy often becomes secondary to psychological significance.

    This is why every generation discovers its own golden age.

    The idealized past changes because the needs of the present change as well.


    The Gothic Understanding of Nostalgia

    Gothic culture offers a particularly sophisticated understanding of nostalgia because it rarely treats the past as something that can be fully recovered.

    Ruins remain ruined. Ghosts remain absent. Lost worlds survive only through fragments, memories, and traces. The Gothic imagination recognizes that time moves in one direction.

    This awareness distinguishes Gothic nostalgia from simple sentimental longing.

    A ruined abbey becomes meaningful not because it can be restored to its original condition but because it reminds viewers of history’s fragility. A faded photograph gains emotional power because it preserves a moment that can never return. The distance between past and present becomes part of the experience itself.

    Rather than denying loss, Gothic aesthetics often embrace it.

    The result is a form of nostalgia that feels reflective rather than restorative. Memory remains valuable even when recovery is impossible.

    This perspective explains why Gothic literature and art continue to resonate. They acknowledge the beauty of the past while recognizing that the past exists largely through interpretation.


    Why We Keep Looking Back

    The enduring attraction of nostalgia reveals a fundamental aspect of human psychology.

    People need stories that provide continuity between past, present, and future. Memory helps construct those stories, even when it simplifies or reshapes reality in the process.

    The past therefore becomes more than a collection of historical events.

    It becomes a source of meaning.

    We romanticize earlier eras not because they were necessarily better but because they help us understand who we are. Lost worlds, vanished traditions, old photographs, abandoned buildings, and inherited objects all create connections across time. They remind us that individual lives form part of larger narratives extending beyond the present moment.

    The Gothic imagination recognized this truth long ago.

    Its fascination with ruins, ancestral histories, forgotten stories, and fading beauty reflects an understanding that memory is never merely about preservation. It is also about interpretation.

    The past survives because each generation recreates it.

    Not as it truly was.

    But as it needs it to be.


    Wear the Darkness

    If Why We Romanticize the Past speaks to your fascination with Gothic culture, nostalgia, history, and memory, explore the Edgar Allan Poets store. Our apparel celebrates the beauty of forgotten worlds and the stories that continue to echo across time.

    Edgar Allan Poe Gothic apparel and noir-inspired fashion from the Edgar Allan Poets store


    Join the Noir Newsletter

    Receive more essays on Gothic culture, nostalgia, literature, memory, symbolism, and the psychology behind the stories we tell about the past.


    Enter the Noir Atmosphere

    Continue the atmosphere behind Why We Romanticize the Past through the official Edgar Allan Poets playlist, where memory, melancholy, and cinematic storytelling meet in sound.


    Frequently Asked Questions

    Why do people romanticize the past?

    People often romanticize the past because memory selectively preserves emotionally meaningful experiences while reducing the intensity of everyday difficulties and uncertainties.

    What is nostalgia?

    Nostalgia is a complex emotional response involving longing, reflection, memory, and personal or cultural connections to the past.

    What is the difference between history and nostalgia?

    History seeks to understand the past as accurately as possible, while nostalgia interprets the past through emotional and psychological experiences.

    Why is nostalgia important in Gothic culture?

    Gothic culture frequently explores ruins, memory, loss, and vanished worlds. These themes naturally connect to nostalgia and the emotional significance of the past.

    What is reflective nostalgia?

    Reflective nostalgia acknowledges that the past cannot be recovered while still finding value and meaning in memory and remembrance.


    The post Why We Romanticize the Past appeared first on Edgar Allan Poets – Noir Rock Band.

  • “The label staff just assume the artists get rich. I told a girl in the office what we earned. Her jaw hit the floor”: Steve Hogarth recalls Marillion’s bad old days before crowdfunding

    Marillion’s revolutionary crowdfunding campaign, which they ran to fund their 2001 Anoraknophobia album, came after they’d been dropped by their major label in 1995. The prog icons are credited with building the pledge model, which exploded across the industry until the collapse of PledgeMusic in 2017.

    By that time Marilion – who’d released F.E.A.R. with the defunct platform a year earlier – had moved on. Looking back in 2016, singer Steve Hogarth recalled just how far they’d come after making the great escape, and inspiring other artists to do the same.

    “The major labels are not doing it because they love you. If they’re really honest, they’re not even doing it because they’re excited about the music.

    They’re excited about the new Coldplay album because they can hear there’s a hit that’s going straight on the radio, and it’s worth a million quid. I’m talking here about the people who work on the top floor, not the people who work in the offices.

    Another thing I learned – which really shocked me – was that the people in the offices actually had no kind of clue about what kind of deal you’re on, what your royalty payments are like, whether you’re getting one per cent or 90 per cent of an album. They just assume that all the artists are paid really well for what they do, and all get rich.

    I remember speaking to a girl there and telling her what we earned and her jaw hit the floor. She had no idea. So there are only four people in these major labels, in the business affairs department, who have any clue what the artists are being paid.

    Back in those days, I don’t think we felt directly pressured to change the music. The way they would exert their influence was, they would bring a producer in and they would whisper in his ear.

    The phone would ring and it would be, “Is there this and is there that? Have you made sure there’s enough of that?” That way, they didn’t have to come to us as artists and say, “Can you sing it a bit more like that and is there enough chorus?” —because they were whispering at the producer.

    The label would always insist on appointing a producer because he was their control system: who knows what the fuck you can do with artists, but you can whisper in a producer’s ear.

    Thankfully, that was a long time ago.”

  • AN NCS PREMIERE: NONTINUUM — “AS I LEAVE THIS BODY”

    (written by Islander) Today we help pave the way for the return of the Australian black metal band Nontinuum after an extended absence, and so a bit of background may be useful. They were originally founded in 2010 as a bedroom recording project rooted in atmospheric and depressive black metal, and their debut demo Dwelling […]

    The post AN NCS PREMIERE: NONTINUUM — “AS I LEAVE THIS BODY” appeared first on NO CLEAN SINGING.

  • Album Review: Behemoth – I, Scvlptor

    Album Review: Behemoth – I, Scvlptor

    Reviewed by Dan Barnes

    Not so much a new studio album as a revisitation of some of themes and ideas that didn’t make the grade originally but have been dusted off and reappraised. Behemoth’s latest collection, I Scvlptor, is more of a compilation than a new album, coming less then eighteen months after the release of last year’s The Shit ov God.

    Intended to act as something of a bridge between the band’s black metal roots and their more-recent death-centric style, I, Scvlptor is comprised of eight tracks, some new, some re-recorded, some not-heard-before hidden gems, which makes this album as more than a curio in Behemoth’s back-catalogue.

    The title-track, and first single, begins with eerie and creepy darkness, orchestral bleakness and a haunting ambience occupy the early parts of the tune; those classical motifs run through the whole composition, giving a bombastic and uncomfortable vibe to the second half, taking classic Behemoth blasphemies and giving them a modern twist. Thematically, it is a song about the endless process of self-recreation, which is the over-arching consideration of the record.

    The previously unheard Lord ov the Horizons is laced with a morose acoustic riff, which never once waivers no matter which direction the track takes. Doomy at times, yet with a choral section that suggests Nergal had recorded the combined choirs of the Satanic Realm as backing vocals. Also included here is the studio rough mix of this song which, for me, was preferable to the finalised version for the very fact of it being unrefined.

    The third previously unreleased track on I, Scvlptor is Begotten, a fast-paced classic black metal-era Behemoth tune that utilises the second wave’s preoccupation with the lo-fi and creates and explosive and uncompromising four-minutes. It is a fine reminder that the Poles started life as a Church—bothering Black Metal act, only introducing the death metal elements on 1997’s Bewitching the Pomerania EP.

    Early tracks Rise of the Black Storm of Evil, from the 1993 demo, The Return of the Northern Moon, and In Thy Pandemaeternum, found on the Pandemonic Incantations third full-length in 1998, have been re-recorded with Behemoth’s modern aesthetic without losing the original spirit or intention of the songs.

    And, although without any need to do so, Behemoth have gone back to source and have included an acknowledgement of the debt owed to two of the original founders of the whole damn scene. Venom’s In League With Satan features a contribution from Dimmu Borgir main man, Shagrath, to reinterpret the track life a full-bloodied rite to the dark lord himself. Big and bombastic, it oozes filth and sin, the chanting chorus is as though Nergal has found more work for that Demonic choir.

    A live version of Bathory’s The Return of Darkness and Evil is included and features Sakis Tolis of Rotting Christ in what becomes a rollicking run-through of one of the genre’s seminal tunes. The live energy and the fleshing out of the sound give this cover a presence that cannot be ignored.

    Looking at the progression of Behemoth from their second wave-adjacent formative years to the blackened-death metal monster – the Biblical behemoth, if you will – we know today. I, Scvlptor is a peak behind that curtain to see if the newer fans want to tread the infernal path the band themselves took in the early nineties. I’d recommend you do – they have such pleasures to show you!

    For all the latest news, reviews, interviews across the heavy metal spectrum follow THE RAZORS’S EDGE on facebook, twitter and instagram.

    The post Album Review: Behemoth – I, Scvlptor appeared first on The Razor's Edge.

  • BAD WOLVES Drop Posthumous DOLLY PARTON Tribute Days After Losing AJ REBOLLO

    Bad Wolves‘ cover of Dolly Parton‘s “Jolene” is out now, though not in the form anyone originally pitched. Parton was set to add her own vocals to the band’s heavier take on her 1973 classic, but she died on Aug. 25 following a short cancer battle before that could happen.

    Bad Wolves‘ label, Better Noise Music, put the track out today without Parton on it, directing proceeds to her Imagination Library, a charity that sends free books to kids from birth through age 5.

    The release lands just three days after guitarist AJ Rebollo walked away from Bad Wolves, calling the decision to put “Jolene” out the “final nail in the coffin.”

    Rebollo announced his exit on Friday (Aug. 28) over social media, ending a two-year run with the band. He accused Better Noise Music of acting in bad faith by pushing the Parton cover out so soon after her death.

    “I am making the decision to step away as a member of Bad Wolves,” Rebollo wrote in his statement.

    “In short, I can no longer in good faith remain a member and co-sign the decisions constantly being made FOR this band by the label, among other issues I have with the inner workings of the business.”

    According to Rebollo, the band itself pushed back on releasing the song once Parton had passed.

    “We, as an entity, told the label we had no interest in releasing the cover after learning of Dolly‘s unfortunate passing as her collaboration on the song was no longer a possibility, and we felt it would (understandably) be interpreted as somewhat of a capitalization on her passing from an outside perspective,” he wrote. “They went ahead and posted that we were releasing it anyway, despite efforts from more than one member, myself included, to oppose it.

    “While the donation to her Imagination Library is an incredible choice to do something good with the profits, I can’t help but feel there is ill intent behind the decision to release the song,” he added.

    Rebollo framed the “Jolene” fight as one symptom of a larger problem with how the band’s business gets run.

    “With the label completely disregarding numerous decisions we make out of passion, and ultimately just unknowingly exhausting the band’s attempts to fully enjoy being here, I am no longer happy here,” Rebollo wrote.

    “The amount of hate, negativity, and harassment we receive on a daily basis due to decisions made outside of our control has taken a massive toll on our sanity.”

    Bad Wolves has already been through a fair amount of lineup turnover. Original singer Tommy Vext left in 2021 and was replaced by Daniel “DL” Laskiewicz, who later left to join Falling In Reverse as their bassist. Bad Wolves brought in Sara “Killboy” Skinner as its new singer earlier this year.

    Last week, Skinner posted a video claiming Bad Wolves got dropped from Christian rock act Skillet‘s upcoming tour after that band’s fanbase spread a false rumor that Skinner was a “trans OnlyFans bitch.” Her response left the door open just enough: “only one of those things is true. Have fun finding out, and we will see you on the next tour.”

    When the “Jolene” cover was first announced last week, Bad Wolves founder, drummer and songwriter John Boecklin explained how the collaboration came together in the first place.

    “Our singer is a big fan of Dolly and had posted a bunch of videos of her covering ‘Jolene.’ So, we decided to make a heavy metal cover version for our next album. On hearing our version, our label CEO Dan Waite sent the finished demo to Dolly‘s manager, Danny Nozell, with a request for Dolly to guest feature on our version. We heard back that Danny had played the track to Dolly, and that Dolly loved our version, and that Dolly was going to go into the studio and add her vocals very soon.

    “We then sent over the stems for Dolly‘s studio engineers to work with. Like everyone, we were devastated of this week’s news of Dolly‘s passing. We will honor Dolly‘s incredible legacy by donating proceeds from ‘Jolene’ to the Dolly Parton‘s Imagination Library.”

    This isn’t the first time Bad Wolves has released a tribute cover in the immediate wake of tragedy. Eight and a half years ago, the band put out its version of The Cranberries‘ “Zombie” just four days after singer Dolores O’Riordan died in January 2018, with proceeds going to her three children. O’Riordan had actually been scheduled to record her own vocals on that track the day she died.

    That one didn’t sit well with her surviving bandmates either. The Cranberries, whose 2019 album In The End included posthumous vocals from O’Riordan, told ABC New Radio they weren’t fans of the Bad Wolves version.

    “[I] didn’t really like it,” drummer Fergal Lawler said. “It wasn’t my cup of tea.”

    Guitarist Noel Hogan agreed, saying the timing felt off. “The whole thing seemed insensitive or something,” Hogansaid, adding that the cover came out “a bit too soon. For my liking, anyway.”

    The post BAD WOLVES Drop Posthumous DOLLY PARTON Tribute Days After Losing AJ REBOLLO appeared first on Sonic Perspectives.

  • Bad Wolves’ Divisive Cover Of Dolly Parton’s “Jolene” Arrives Online

    Guitarist AJ Rebollo exited the band last weekend, claiming the band’s label ignored the group’s opposition to release the cover.

    The post Bad Wolves’ Divisive Cover Of Dolly Parton’s “Jolene” Arrives Online appeared first on Theprp.com.

  • Album Review: Chat Pile – Who Loves The Sun

    Album Review: Chat Pile – Who Loves The Sun

    Reviewed by Rob Barker

    Much anticipated, and preluded with three fantastic single releases earlier in the month, Chat Pile’s Who Loves the Sun unleashes exactly what we were all hoping for in the bands fifth studio album. The nasty-sounding Oklahoma quartet’s particular brand of racket has affected and inspired the airwaves for a few years now, with a unique and pretty special brand of noise-meets-sludge-meets-hardcore, with a post-punk twist of despair thrown in for good measure.

    Creature starts off the album with a trademark ugly aggression, helped along by the pure filth of the bass tone, twisting into the crashing rhythms of one of the pre-released tracks Deep Blue. The album progresses to Same Rules with an unsettling atmosphere that reminded me a little bit of some of Earthtone9’s slower and darker sounding tracks.

    PEN I S MALL comes in next with a notably more aggressive and abrasive feeling to it, more straightforward aggression than the dark nastiness of previous tracks; another one that was released prior to the album coming out and for good reason – this is a track to play to your mates who don’t know the band and show them what Chat Pile are all about. Shrine and Intruder both show off a pretty cool throwback 90’s sound whilst also remaining modern and innovative with really cool and noticeable guitar riffs as a main hook, and Kayo Dot vibes in relation to musical artistry.

    Sinister, sludgy and noisy are the main focus of Christabel ’26, before back to more heavy, gross guitar-led stand-out track Influence. The bands true avant-garde and artistic side shines through next with the spoken work horror show that is Family Funeral reminiscent of some of Oxbow’s finer work, before the finale of October All the Time wraps up the album as though it’s the aftermath of something truly awful and despairing (totally in a good way!).

    This is a cracking album. If you’re a fan of Chat Pile anyway you won’t be disappointed by any means. It delivers what we’d like it to in terms of just about everything really, and delivers it well, with gusto, aggression and a foul taste. Newbies to the band will be impressed with the bands unique and innovative approach to the genre, almost the perfect balance between art-rock and no-bullshit. Play loud and play often.

    For all the latest news, reviews, interviews across the heavy metal spectrum follow THE RAZORS’S EDGE on facebook, twitter and instagram.

    The post Album Review: Chat Pile – Who Loves The Sun appeared first on The Razor's Edge.

  • Sharon Osbourne Publicly Defends Marilyn Manson And Says She Witnessed Something That Changed Her Mind

    marilyn-manson-sharon-osbourne

    Sharon Osbourne has publicly defended Marilyn Manson against the sexual assault and abuse allegations made against him since 2021. Speaking with her son Jack on the latest episode of The Osbournes podcast, she called Manson a great artist, said she doesn’t believe he did what he’s been accused of, and described him as a friend who always will be. She went considerably further than that, too — making a graphic claim about something she says she personally witnessed involving one of the women currently suing him. Manson has never been criminally charged and denies all of the allegations.

    🎧 STREAM THE METAL BREAKDOWN DAILY NOW:

    Scott Penfold covers the Sharon Osbourne comments on today’s Metal Breakdown Daily — what she actually said, where the legal case genuinely stands, and why the distinction between civil and criminal keeps getting lost in this story. Download the free Loaded Radio App on Apple iOS and Google Play and get it every weekday morning.

    What she said

    Her position, in her own framing.

    She began by calling Manson a great artist and saying she doesn’t care what anybody says — pre-empting the complaints she expected. Her argument on the allegations themselves ran along two lines.

    First, a general point about the accusations. She noted that women abuse men too, and questioned whether Manson had ever presented himself as anything other than what he is — asking whether he’d ever tried to be light and breezy, a surfer guy. Her conclusion: people knew what they were getting themselves into.

    She extended that to the circumstances, saying people were begging to get on the tour bus, begging to get near him and be photographed, and asking what they expected.

    Second, and directly: she said she doesn’t think he did what they said, that he’s a friend and always will be, and that she doesn’t believe half of it.

    Then the firsthand claim. Sharon stated that she personally witnessed one of the women suing Manson — whom she described as a major part of the case — initiate a sexual encounter with him, unprompted, at Soho House. She said Manson did not ask for it.

    Asked by Jack whether she was physically present, she confirmed she was, and said she was there with manager and film producer Andy Gould.

    Her stated reason for going public with it: there are two sides to every story, and people should leave him alone.

    Jack’s response was to point out that she may now find herself pulled into the proceedings.

    We are not reproducing the explicit detail of that claim. It concerns an unnamed woman who has alleged sexual assault, it is unverified, and Sharon is the only source. The substance of what she’s alleging and the argument she’s making with it are above. Andy Gould has not commented, and the woman has not responded.

    🤘 LIVE & LOUD: Stream the World’s Hardest Radio Station 24/7

    Where the case actually stands

    This is the part that keeps getting flattened in coverage, so let’s be precise.

    The allegations. More than a dozen women have come forward since Manson’s former fiancée Evan Rachel Wood publicly accused him in early 2021 of abuse during their relationship. Several filed civil lawsuits alleging sexual assault, abuse and related claims. Manson has consistently denied all of it. His manager, label and talent agents dropped him at the time.

    What’s been resolved. He settled with actress Esmé Bianco in January 2023 and with an unidentified accuser in September of that year. A suit brought by Ashley Morgan Smithline was withdrawn, with Smithline recanting and saying she’d been manipulated into making the allegations. Manson also filed a defamation suit against Wood, which he ultimately withdrew in November 2024 after repeated setbacks.

    What’s still live. A suit filed by Bianca Allaine Kyne in 2024, alleging incidents in the 1990s. And a jury trial in the case brought by his former personal assistant Ashley Walters — scheduled for November 15, 2027, five years after the original filing. Walters alleges sexual harassment, sexual assault, sexual battery and infliction of emotional distress relating to 2010 and 2011.

    The criminal side. After a four-year investigation, the LA District Attorney’s office declined to file charges in January 2025. DA Nathan J. Hochman stated that the domestic violence allegations fell outside the statute of limitations and that prosecutors could not prove sexual assault charges beyond a reasonable doubt.

    So: no criminal charges, ongoing civil litigation under a far lower burden of proof, and consistent denial from Manson throughout. That’s the honest state of it, and it’s a more complicated picture than either side’s supporters tend to present.

    marilyn-manson-albums-ranked

    Why Sharon is speaking now

    The connection is recent and specific.

    Manson contributed a video tribute to Ozzy Osbourne at the Back To The Beginning all-star show on July 5 this year, and was invited to attend Ozzy’s private funeral.

    Sharon has never been a stranger to saying exactly what she thinks — The Osbournes podcast has been built on that for years, and her career before it was built on it too. But she’s talking about someone she’s describing as a friend, in the months after her husband’s death, on a show she makes with her son.

    Whatever you make of the content, that’s the context it comes from.

    We Also Recommend – The Antichrist Superstar’s Legacy: Every Marilyn Manson Album Ranked From Worst To Best

    The part people will argue about

    Setting aside the firsthand claim entirely, the argument Sharon makes around it is the piece that will generate the most heat — and it deserves examining rather than just quoting.

    Her framing is essentially that Manson never hid who he was, that people sought his company knowing that, and that they therefore share responsibility for what followed.

    That’s a genuinely contested position. Supporters will read it as a fair point about adults making choices with full information. Critics will read it as the oldest deflection there is, and note that a persona is not consent.

    It’s worth saying plainly: that argument is not a legal defence, and it isn’t how any of these cases will be decided. Consent isn’t waived by knowing what someone’s stage act is like. Whether the specific allegations happened is a separate question entirely, and one a jury may address in November 2027.

    Both things can be true — that the allegations remain unproven, and that “you knew what he was like” is not the reason they’re unproven.

    Check This Out – The Irrevocable Legacy of MARILYN MANSON: From Antichrist Superstar to Legal Reckoning

    Meanwhile

    Manson himself has had an active year. One Assassination Under God – Chapter 2, his thirteenth album, arrived on August 14 via Nuclear Blast, and was expanded with a bonus track a fortnight later. He’s currently out on the Freaks On Parade tour with Rob Zombie, with two Antichrist Superstar 30th anniversary shows at The Wiltern booked for Halloween and November 1.

    He has not commented on Sharon’s remarks.

    TL;DR

    • What happened: Sharon Osbourne publicly defended Marilyn Manson on the latest episode of The Osbournes podcast, speaking with her son Jack.
    • What she said: that Manson is a great artist, that she doesn’t believe he did what he’s accused of, that he’s a friend and always will be, and that she doesn’t believe half of it.
    • Her argument: that Manson never presented himself as anything other than what he is, and that people who sought his company knew what they were getting into.
    • The firsthand claim: she says she personally witnessed one of the women suing him initiate a sexual encounter with him unprompted at Soho House, with manager Andy Gould present. The woman is not named and has not responded.
    • The legal position: Manson has never been criminally charged. The LA DA declined to prosecute in January 2025. Three civil suits have been resolved; one remains live, and a jury trial in the Ashley Walters case is set for November 2027.
    • Why now: Manson contributed a video tribute to Ozzy Osbourne in July and was invited to the private funeral.

    FAQ

    What did Sharon Osbourne say about Marilyn Manson?

    On the latest episode of The Osbournes podcast, she called Manson a great artist, said she doesn’t think he did what he’s been accused of, described him as a friend who always will be, and said she doesn’t believe half of the allegations. She also argued that people who sought his company knew what he was like, and made a firsthand claim about something she says she witnessed involving one of the women suing him.

    Has Marilyn Manson been convicted of anything?

    No. Manson has never been criminally charged. Following a four-year investigation, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office declined to file charges in January 2025, citing the statute of limitations on domestic violence allegations and an inability to prove sexual assault charges beyond a reasonable doubt. He denies all allegations against him.

    What is the status of the lawsuits against Marilyn Manson?

    Three have been resolved — settlements with Esmé Bianco and an unidentified accuser, and a withdrawn and recanted suit from Ashley Morgan Smithline. A suit filed by Bianca Allaine Kyne in 2024 remains live, and a jury trial in the case brought by former personal assistant Ashley Walters is scheduled for November 15, 2027.

    Why is Sharon Osbourne defending Marilyn Manson?

    She described him as a longstanding friend. Manson contributed a video tribute to Ozzy Osbourne at the Back To The Beginning event in July 2026 and was invited to attend Ozzy’s private funeral. Her stated reason for speaking publicly was that there are two sides to every story.

    Has Marilyn Manson responded to Sharon Osbourne’s comments?

    Not as of publication. Manson is currently touring North America on the Freaks On Parade run with Rob Zombie, following the August release of his thirteenth album One Assassination Under God – Chapter 2.

    Unproven allegations, a declined prosecution, an active civil case, and one of metal’s most outspoken figures deciding to say something. Keep it locked on the Loaded Radio stream — follow Loaded Radio for daily rock and metal news.

    The post Sharon Osbourne Publicly Defends Marilyn Manson And Says She Witnessed Something That Changed Her Mind appeared first on Loaded Radio.

  • Album Review: Vanaheim – Roede Voor De Borst

    Album Review: Vanaheim – Roede Voor De Borst

    Reviewed by Oli Gonzalez

    When we think of The Netherlands and their metal scene, metal heavyweight acts Epica and Within Temptation often take the limelight, and can be considered the nation’s finest exports alongside tulips, clogs, and Heineken lager! However, there’s a rather intriguing and overlooked folk rock and metal scene brewing in the nation’s underground, brewing alongside Amstel. The likes of Sowulu, Heidvolk, and Iskandr are amongst those spearheading this shift from symphonic music and through to a darker side of metal, mixing this with traditional folk instruments and anthems.

    Another band within this movement, and under the spotlight today is none other than Vanaheim. Given their impressive festival and touring pedigree that includes slots at Wacken Open Air and Grasspop Metal Meeting, whilst sharing the stage with the likes of Ensiferum, Alestorm, and the aforementioned Heidvolk, they’re not one to overlook! With sights set on an autumn tour headlined by scene legends Tyr, they’ll go into this on the back of their new opus “Roede voor de Borst”. So, what can we expect from their second studio full length?

    Well, let’s address the elephant in the room; the language barrier. With an estimated 25 million Dutch speakers globally, it’s safe to say this is a minority language (especially when you consider around 620 million speak Spanish or 130 million German speakers). Whilst this means most people won’t be able to connect to the underlying stories and narratives being portrayed, instead Vanaheim find themselves oddly in a position of power. See, by singing in their native tongue, they can convey emotion and grit in their voices that likely wouldn’t have been possible in a foreign tongue. Also, the unique inflections and sounds of Dutch gives them an identity in the marketplace. Just look at what Rammstein achieved by sticking to (mostly) German – who even knew what ‘Du Hast’ meant before they heard it on Kerrang!? Also, it’s not so much what Vanaheim say, it’s how it’s delivered. Zino delivers harsher growls and screams that instantly command respect. But it’s really the gang style choruses with multiple clean voices joining in unison for the choruses and thus providing the vocal hooks. The kind you’ll want to sing along to once you’ve sank a few bottles of Grolsch (this will be the last of the Dutch beer analogies, I promise) and thus capturing the spirit of the ale house and drunken sing-alongs, where staying in tune is optional. After all, isn’t that the essence of folk music, metal or otherwise?

    So, now that the linguistics lesson is over, what can we expect from the underlying music?

    Guitar driven anthems like ‘Geestenmist’ (which opens up the album) and ‘Het Laaste Licht’ seem rather on brand for Vanaheim; chunky and choppy guitar riffs that sit above a rich tapestry of woodwind and operatic choir voices to add the melodic focal point as well as adding a dramatic and epic vibe to proceedings. Though they can really crank up the distortion on tracks like ‘Kroos en Slijk’ and lay down satisfying headbanging grooves, though not losing any of the folk spiced melody.

    Some songs feel more epic than others. Take ‘Eendracht Maakt Macht’ for instance, translating as (roughly) ‘unity makes strength’. They got the strength part right! One of the standouts on the album, this spans multiple movements within seven minutes and with constantly shifting dynamics and textures, you’ll be hooked and thoroughly immersed and engaged through the ever-changing landscape.

    Which brings me onto the next point; song and overall album length. Hovering around seven minutes each, this may make some casuals squirm. Though this longer than usual track length is necessary to allow the movements time to brew and flow organically, rather than being forced through the mincer to be condensed into a more radio friendly format. Nope, Vahaheim sticks to their guns here, and seven minutes flies faster than seven minutes should do. As does the album, at a rather modest six track length. The end result is a package that feels digestible without feeling too overwhelming.

    For all the latest news, reviews, interviews across the heavy metal spectrum follow THE RAZORS’S EDGE on facebook, twitter and instagram.

    The post Album Review: Vanaheim – Roede Voor De Borst appeared first on The Razor's Edge.